2011-2012 Round 4 - SC Championship

congrats fiasco

DET, ANA and COL were too easy opponents.

Good series. Glad to have proven to everyone that you have to lose some deals if you wanna make it to game 7 of stanley cup finals (@ tazer, even fiasco at some times.....)

Thank you Mirror, Tbh, your team is not as young and not as easy to take either, if the SC finals ended in 7 games, that means something definatly.

Also and werent as easy matchup either as both have great GM's and both great teams.

Now trade me Kane

Well what do you know, I lost in 7 games to the cup champions congrats

also i never said u were losing in a deal, actually contrary, some of your deals were one sided (yours more) IMO only deal which u would have potentially lost, would have been the ryan deal which never went thru.

Fiasco wrote: also i never said u were losing in a deal, actually contrary, some of your deals were one sided (yours more) IMO only deal which u would have potentially lost, would have been the ryan deal which never went thru.

well you were critisizing my Richards deal...

Which was..

Latendresse (CAR)
Clutterbuck (NYI)
Stoner (LA)
Falk (LA)

for

Richards

check their ratings and you'll see who actually won the deal.

Then the JJ deal.. I still laugh at it. JJ hasn't developed, and I got Schultz and Carlson for him.


AND my Doughty deal, is just funny.

Doughty for Byfuglien + Kane, then traded Byfuglien for Smid + Barker + Eager, so actually Doughty for Kane, Smid, Barker and Eager which is just funny.

I have yet to see how I lost any of these deals, but if tazer says I lost them all, it comes down to 2 possibilities:

1. He's jealous of my team (how, why, idk)
2. Hasn't checked my players' ratings lately

I am not jealous lol.

Where did i say you lost any deals? I said it would've been smarter to keep Richards IMO and I said you got a steal for Doughty.